‘Grazed and Confused?’ Reveals Cattle’s GHG Impact

‘Grazed and Confused?’ Reveals Cattle’s GHG Impact

Grass-fed beef is not as environmentally-friendly as some proponents claim. That’s the conclusion of a new study from U.K.-based Food Climate Research Network (FCRN).

 

The study, titled “Grazed and Confused?” suggests the net contributions of grass- and grain-finished animals’ to GHG emissions shows that both are contributors to the problem. The grass-only diet does not offset their own emissions, or that of other animals, says Tara Garnett, an FCRN researcher.

 

Writing in a blog for a UK-based news analysis site The Conversation, Garnett says, “We asked one question: what is the net climate impact of grass-fed ruminants, taking into account all greenhouse gas emissions and removals?

 

“We found that well-managed grazing in some contexts … can cause some carbon to be sequestered in soils. But, the maximum global potential (using generous assumptions) would offset only 20 percent to 60 percent of emissions from grazing cattle, 4 percent to 11 percent of total livestock emissions, and 0.6 percent to 1.6 percent of total annual greenhouse gas emissions,” Garnett wrote. “In other words, grazing livestock – even in a best-case scenario – are net contributors to the climate problem, as are all livestock.”

 

The researchers acknowledge the growing demand for protein worldwide, but for grass-fed animals to meet that demand we “would have to massively expand grazing land into forest and intensify existing grassland through the use of nutrient inputs, which among other things, would cause devastating CO2 releases and increases in methane and nitrous oxide emissions."

 

If projections for animal product consumption remain unchanged, livestock would equal one-third of the total emissions budget adopted under the Paris climate agreement.

 

"Increasing grass-fed ruminant numbers is, therefore, a self-defeating climate strategy," the report concluded.

 

Garnett’s blog about the report can be read here:

https://theconversation.com/why-eating-grass-fed-beef-isnt-going-to-help-fight-climate-change-84237

 

 

Latest News

Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High
Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High

After a mostly sluggish April, market-ready fed cattle saw a solid rally in the North and steady money in the South. Futures markets began to look past the psychologically bearish H5N1 virus news.

APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison
APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison

APHIS issued its final rule on animal ID that has been in place since 2013, switching from solely visual tags to tags that are both electronically and visually readable for certain classes of cattle moving interstate.

How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?
How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?

“If we step back and look at what that means for farmland, we're taking our energy production system from highly centralized production facilities and we have to distribute it,” says David Muth.

Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado
Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado

Six wolf depredations of cattle have been confirmed in Colorado from reintroduced wolves.

Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid
Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid

Cattle and hog feeders find dramatically lower feed costs compared to last year with higher live anumal sales prices. Beef packers continue to struggle with negative margins.

Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation
Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation

What’s your context? One of the 6 soil health principles we discuss in this week’s episode is knowing your context. What’s yours? What is your goal? What’s the reason you run cattle?