Nalivka: USDA’s Efforts to “Fix” the U.S. Food System

.
.
(Hall & Hall)

USDA just announced “major actions” to “spur competition, protect producers, and reduce costs.”  To be sure that USDA gets full credit for their stated intentions, I used quotations.  I find this announcement more intimidating to the free market than helpful. 

The opportunity for anti-competitive practices in agricultural markets has always existed.  And, as markets become increasingly sophisticated to meet the demands of an increasingly sophisticated industry, there is no doubt stronger oversight and actions to prevent anti-competitive practices may be needed.  However, my conclusions after reading USDA’s statement is that USDA obviously believes that what I term sophistication in agricultural markets requires greater oversight and involvement or management, if you will, by government. I have a problem with that and I hope ranchers and farmers do, too.

One basic premise of economics is that the economy is defined by human interaction.  This premise is fundamental to markets.  It’s this constant interaction between buyers and sellers in the domestic and global marketplace that feeds the free market and I emphasize free market.  As an economist, I may look at prices, inventory numbers, etc., but those prices and inventory numbers represent human interaction.  Predicting markets is analyzing that flow of human interaction and the likely path those interactions will take.   When bureaucrats and politicians tell me they are going to “spur competition, protect producers, and reduce costs,” I see a major upheaval in free market activity.

Ask yourself how many times you have seen the perceived problems become even worse after the government steps in to manage.  The federal lands often provide a prime example of over-reach and misdirected management.   I am not saying that all federal lands management agendas turns into a disaster but certainly, there are plenty of examples when increased regulatory activity was not the answer.  I firmly believe that this latest announcement by USDA will fall into the latter category.

I might ask farmers and ranchers how the last 100 years of government oversight and regulations aimed toward a cheap food policy for Americans has worked out.  Perhaps, that policy has run its course!  Time to replace that policy conceived during FDR with one aimed toward “fairer markets for all producers, ensuring access to safe, healthy and nutritious food in all communities, building new markets and streams of income for farmers, and producers using climate smart food and forestry practices, making historic investments in infrastructure and clean energy capabilities in rural America.”  

I propose U.S. agriculture and the food industry think seriously about this latest USDA “fix” before jumping in with both feet!

 

Latest News

Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High
Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High

After a mostly sluggish April, market-ready fed cattle saw a solid rally in the North and steady money in the South. Futures markets began to look past the psychologically bearish H5N1 virus news.

APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison
APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison

APHIS issued its final rule on animal ID that has been in place since 2013, switching from solely visual tags to tags that are both electronically and visually readable for certain classes of cattle moving interstate.

How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?
How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?

“If we step back and look at what that means for farmland, we're taking our energy production system from highly centralized production facilities and we have to distribute it,” says David Muth.

Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado
Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado

Six wolf depredations of cattle have been confirmed in Colorado from reintroduced wolves.

Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid
Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid

Cattle and hog feeders find dramatically lower feed costs compared to last year with higher live anumal sales prices. Beef packers continue to struggle with negative margins.

Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation
Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation

What’s your context? One of the 6 soil health principles we discuss in this week’s episode is knowing your context. What’s yours? What is your goal? What’s the reason you run cattle?