Maximizing Crop Profits Under Limited Water

Center pivot irrigated green crop circles west of Dumas, Texas. Many circles are only partially irrigated because of limited irrigation capacities and the practice of crop rotation.
Center pivot irrigated green crop circles west of Dumas, Texas. Many circles are only partially irrigated because of limited irrigation capacities and the practice of crop rotation.
(National Agriculture Imagery Program, FSA, USDA)

Researchers have adapted a crop model for use in the Texas High Plains to simulate crop water use and corn yield that can help producers adjust center-pivot irrigation strategies and maximize profitability with limited water.

The project is a collaborative work between the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service, ARS, Soil and Water Management Research-Bushland; West Texas A&M University in Canyon, Texas A&M AgriLife in Amarillo and the University of Castilla-La Mancha, UCLM, in Spain.

“Results from this adapted model allow producers to evaluate how best to allocate the limited water that is available to a fraction of the land area under the pivot that, over the long term, maximizes profitability and utilizes water resources more efficiently,” said Robert Schwartz, Ph.D., USDA-ARS soil scientist at Bushland.

“Some scenarios in the study even demonstrated that profitability could be maximized by irrigating a fraction of the area but using less water compared to irrigating the full pivot circle, thereby conserving groundwater for future use,” he said.

Joining Schwartz on the U.S.-based team are Paul Colaizzi, Ph.D., research agriculture engineer, and Louis Baumhardt, Ph.D., research soil scientist, both with ARS-Bushland; Jourdan Bell, Ph.D., Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service agronomist, Amarillo; and Bridget Guerrero, Ph.D., associate professor of agricultural business and economics, West Texas A&M. Leading the UCLM efforts are agricultural engineers Alfonso Dominguez, Ph.D., and Jose Pardo, Ph.D.

This research was supported in part by the Ogallala Aquifer Program, a consortium of USDA ARS, Kansas State University, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, AgriLife Extension, Texas Tech University and West Texas A&M.

Limited groundwater, extreme drought

Crop producers in this semi-arid region of the Texas High Plains largely depend on groundwater irrigation. Each season, crop producers in the region evaluate how much land area could be irrigated under the pivot with limited water.

“As groundwater continues to decline, reducing the irrigated area allows producers to increase the irrigation capacity per irrigated acre rather than irrigating a larger area at a deficit,” Bell said.

But addressing this is not straightforward, because producer decisions to reduce the irrigated areas influences grain yield, input costs and the timing of the irrigation applications.

Uncertain weather patterns also impact this decision, Bell said. In a drought year, producers may need to reduce the irrigated area more than in a wet year.

“This model is timely for producers making decisions for the 2022 production season,” she said, adding the Texas High Plains is currently in an extreme drought.

Strategizing to improve efficiency

To help producers with these decisions, the researchers completed a study that used 25 years of climatic data to simulate corn production. They used a range of irrigation capacities, the maximum amount of water that can be delivered to an irrigated acre in a day, to evaluate water allocation strategies that could increase profitability and improve the efficient use of water. 

Many crop producers in the Texas High Plains irrigate crops using a center-pivot system. This system often needs five or more days to complete a single revolution around the field, depending on irrigation capacity.

When evaluating strategies to maximize profit under limited irrigation, the study considered irrigation well capacities and the center pivot travel time, as these factors influence how much water can be applied and the end-of-season yield.

“The model also considers preplant soil moisture, preseason irrigation, soil water holding capacity, and the system flow capacity as well as annual drawdown, which impacts the amount of irrigation a producer can provide later in the season,” Bell said.

Maximum profitability considering capacities

Models are a great way to evaluate how producers’ decisions will impact their bottom line, Guerrero said. This study included the economic factors of expected returns and costs and how those change with producers’ choices about how many acres to plant to certain crops and what amount of water to apply.

 

“This brings to light the differences in net return that can be achieved with different management choices before money is actually spent, ultimately reducing producer risk,” she said.

The model showed that for irrigation capacities representative of the region — 5.2 gallons per minute per acre — and a growing season with average rainfall, maximum profitability was achieved by irrigating about 75% of entire pivot area with the remaining area in fallow or unplanted field or dryland cotton.

Concentrating water generated greater net returns because of lower seed and fertilizer costs and greater corn yields, which increased the productivity per unit of water applied and compensated for lack of production in fallow areas, Bell said. In years with seasonal drought, the irrigated area would need to be further constrained to avoid crop failure and maximize profits.

“This model is unique in that it also considered the productivity of the dryland beyond leaving it fallow,” she said. “When we concentrate irrigation, we are expanding the dryland acres, and better management of dryland acres is increasingly important to maintain the overall farm profitability.”

The model showed that planting cotton on the dryland acres increased the system profitability except in drought years. 

“This study has demonstrated that the crop water use model MOPECO can be adapted to many different scenarios and is a useful tool for improving the environmental and economic sustainability of agricultural systems where water is limiting,” Domínguez said.

The MOPECO model is a tool for identifying optimal production plans and water irrigation management strategies. The model estimates crop yield, production and gross margin as a function of the irrigation depth.

“A simplified version of this model is being tested in many semi-arid areas of the Mediterranean basin and the Americas with the objective of making it available to the farm sector through an online platform,” Dominguez said.

 

Latest News

Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado
Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado

Six wolf depredations of cattle have been confirmed in Colorado from reintroduced wolves.

Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid
Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid

Cattle and hog feeders find dramatically lower feed costs compared to last year with higher live anumal sales prices. Beef packers continue to struggle with negative margins.

Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation
Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation

What’s your context? One of the 6 soil health principles we discuss in this week’s episode is knowing your context. What’s yours? What is your goal? What’s the reason you run cattle?

Colombia Becomes First Country to Restrict US Beef Due to H5N1 in Dairy Cattle
Colombia Becomes First Country to Restrict US Beef Due to H5N1 in Dairy Cattle

Colombia has restricted the import of beef and beef products coming from U.S. states where dairy cows have tested positive for H5N1 as of April 15, according to USDA.

On-farm Severe Weather Safety
On-farm Severe Weather Safety

When a solid home, tornado shelter or basement may be miles away, and you’re caught in a severe storm, keep in mind these on-farm severe weather safety tips.

Quantifying the Value of Good Ranch Management
Quantifying the Value of Good Ranch Management

The value of good management has never been higher. Well managed cow-calf operations can concentrate inputs into short time frames focused on critical control points of production.