The Economic Cost of Feedlot BRD

The Economic Cost of Feedlot BRD

Bovine respiratory disease is the most common disease among feedlot cattle in the United States. It accounts for approximately 75% of feedlot morbidity and 50% to 70% of all feedlot deaths (Edwards, 1996; Galyean, Perino, and Duff, 1999; Loneragan et al., 2001).

The majority of deaths due to BRD occur shortly after arrival to the feedlot or within the first 45 days (Edwards, 1996; Loneragan et al., 2001). In fact, Buhman et al. (2000) reported that about 91% of calves diagnosed with BRD were diagnosed within the first 27 days after arrival.

BRD causes an estimated $800 million to $900 million annually in economic losses from death, reduced feed efficiency, and treatment costs (Chirase and Greene, 2001).

Medical costs attributable to the treatment of BRD are substantial, and the economic impacts of BRD on carcass merit and meat quality further increase the economic costs. Medicine costs accounted for 21% of the decrease, while 79% was attributable to lower carcass weight (8.4% less) and lower quality grade (24.7% more USDA Standard quality grade carcasses).

BRD can also cause economic losses due to decreased gain and carcass values (Duff and Galyean, 2007). A Texas Ranch-to-Rail study found BRD morbidity accounted for 8% higher production costs, not including losses related to decreased performance (Griffin, Perino, and Wittum, 1995). They found cattle with BRD had a 3% decrease in gain compared with healthy cattle and cost the program $111.38 per sick animal. Snowder et al. (2006) estimated economic losses in a 1,000-head feedlot from BRD infection due to lower gains and treatment costs to be approximately $13.90 per animal.

Demand for higher quality products and increased value-based marketing have heightened beef producers’ awareness of health management practices with potential to increase profitability and beef product quality. Feedlot producers able to purchase calves more likely to remain healthy during the feeding period could potentially increase profits through reduced costs and higher revenues. Previous studies document the economic impact from BRD in either backgrounding or finishing programs. The majority of those studies are from animal scientists and veterinarians.

Current research relating to animal disease in agricultural economics journals deals with major outbreaks of infectious diseases (e.g. bovine spongiform encephalopathy or bovine brucellosis), tracking systems, and eradication programs (Amosson et al., 1981; Elbakidze, 2007; Hennessy, Rossen, and Jensen, 2005; Kuchler and Hamm, 2000). Limited research on BRD in feedlot cattle is reported in agricultural economic journals. Nyamusika et al. (1994) however, using a stochastic simulation model of BRD, found significant returns to vaccination of cattle. The simulation found vaccination programs, combined with treatment of BRD, increase net revenues by $44. Further analysis on the economic effects of BRD in the backgrounding phase is warranted along with the effects in the finishing phase and the phases combined.

Knowing the economic impact of BRD on both backgrounding and finishing phases is important. A tool enabling producers to determine whether animals will remain healthy could potentially increase producers’ profits. Serum haptoglobin (Hp) concentration has been suggested as a tool for making management decisions based on data that shows cattle requiring treatment for BRD had a higher Hp concentration upon arrival than calves that remained healthy throughout the preconditioning phase (Berry et al., 2005; Step et al., 2008). Hp is an acute-phase protein produced by the liver in response to cellular injury. Based upon Hp concentration upon arrival producers could potentially determine animals that would remain healthy.

The overall objective of this research was to determine the economic effects of BRD on backgrounding and finishing phases individually, as well as the two phases combined for the same cattle. In addition, this research measures the effectiveness of using serum Hp concentration to predict BRD occurrence and the impact of multiple treatments for BRD in backgrounding on both backgrounding and cattle feeding performance.

Click here for the full research report.

 

Latest News

Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High
Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High

After a mostly sluggish April, market-ready fed cattle saw a solid rally in the North and steady money in the South. Futures markets began to look past the psychologically bearish H5N1 virus news.

APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison
APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison

APHIS issued its final rule on animal ID that has been in place since 2013, switching from solely visual tags to tags that are both electronically and visually readable for certain classes of cattle moving interstate.

How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?
How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?

“If we step back and look at what that means for farmland, we're taking our energy production system from highly centralized production facilities and we have to distribute it,” says David Muth.

Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado
Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado

Six wolf depredations of cattle have been confirmed in Colorado from reintroduced wolves.

Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid
Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid

Cattle and hog feeders find dramatically lower feed costs compared to last year with higher live anumal sales prices. Beef packers continue to struggle with negative margins.

Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation
Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation

What’s your context? One of the 6 soil health principles we discuss in this week’s episode is knowing your context. What’s yours? What is your goal? What’s the reason you run cattle?