Management Practices to Add Value – Part 2

Red Angus calves
Red Angus calves
(Amy Peterson)

As we continue to deal with high feed, fertilizer and fuel costs, this week we focus on additional management practices to add value to beef calves.  As discussed last week, good management adds value.  This value can be captured through marketing preconditioned weaned calves or retained ownership past weaning.  Along with weaning at least 45 days, preconditioning includes several practices that add value to cattle for the buyer and seller.  Beyond this, additional weight gain can be added by growth implants, adding further value to your calves.

  • Bovine respiratory disease is the biggest issue for stocker operators and feedlots, through death loss, antibiotic cost, reduced performance and increased labor.  Fully vaccinated and preconditioned calves have been shown to have reduce sick pulls in the receiving pens by 90% and decrease chronics by over 70%.
  • Castrated steers bring $5-10/cwt more than bulls, and as they get bigger discounts for bulls increase.  Intact bull calves are 1.5 to 2.5 times more likely to get sick, and total gain during receiving is reduced, affecting total performance for the entire ownership period.
  • Dehorning adds value to horned cattle.  Often discounts for horned cattle can match or exceed discounts for bull calves.
  • Discounts for horned bulls can reach up to $25/cwt compared to dehorned or polled steer calves.
  • Implants can increase gains by 10 to 20%. For the cost of $2 or less, the 18 pounds of added weight at sale can be worth over $25.
  • Producers often think they can leave bull calves intact and increase weaning weights due to natural testosterone. Testosterone production is very low until puberty, so weaning weights are not heavier for intact bulls compared to steers. Weaning weights of implanted steers are often much heavier than intact bull calves.

USDA Verified Programs

Verifying management practices through a USDA verified program is another possibility for adding value to calves.  Many of these programs exist and are driven by consumer demand.  USDA verified programs exist to meet any number of verifiable management claims by a producer. 

Typically the claims are defined so consumers can make purchasing decisions at the retail level.  Source and Age Verification for beef has two components.  Source verification is the ability to trace beef back to the farm or ranch where the cattle were born.  Age verification is the ability to document and verify the age of the animal throughout the production chain and at slaughter. 

Natural verification is the ability to document that no antibiotics, growth implants or other additives have been given to animals.  Producers must keep detailed calving records and be willing to share those records with the verifying authority.  Production records alone do not qualify cattle to be sold as verified.  Verified claims have to be validated either through a USDA Process Verified Program (PVP) or a USDA Quality System Assessment (QSA) program.  Both programs require quality management systems where specific production processes and/or attributes are documented in a way that makes them verifiable through required systematic audits. 

PVP and QSA programs have similarities, but can be quite different.  PVPs provide the opportunity to make marketing claims about beef attributes beyond age and source verification (which nearly all PVPs include), including specific genetics, feeding practices, animal welfare, environmental production aspects and other claims that are otherwise difficult to verify by visual inspection. 

QSA defines the type of USDA program that has a narrower scope and is less complex than PVP programs.  QSAs were initially developed primarily to qualify beef for export.  The only beef attributes verifiable through a QSA program are age, source and non-hormone treated cattle (NHTC). 

Local access to these programs is likely through an approved feed yard, breed association, livestock market or major packer.  Interested producers should begin by exploring individual PVPs to determine if they are already producing cattle with the potential to capture additional value beyond source and age verification.   For more detailed information on QSA and PVP programs visit Minding Your Cattle P’s and Q’s: Basic Facts on Source, Age, and other Claim Verification through PVP and QSA Programs | Oklahoma State University (okstate.edu)

Marketing cattle through PVP or QSA programs does not guarantee increased profitability since there is a cost associated with qualifying cattle for these programs (ear tags, audit expense, products required specific to the program, potential cash outlay for participation, etc.).  As well, the loss of production from not using growth implant technologies in specific programs must be evaluated.  That being said, getting paid for the management practices you already have in place (or could effectively implement) is a good idea in a time of high production costs.

 

Dr Mark Johnson discusses preconditioning to add value to cattle on Sunup TV from 7/3/2021. Cow-Calf Corner - Preconditioning Part 1 7/3/21 — SUNUP TV (okstate.edu)

 

A series of videos on management and marketing of preconditioned cattle is available at: http://beef.okstate.edu/ranchers-thursday-lunchtime-series

Videos include:

Influence of Vac45 programs on calf prices https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nakQTuIiIQI

Health management for Vac45 programs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhQ3Xypcesk

Nutrition for weaned calves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KX4iUylatW8

Budgeting for preconditioning https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYyv3TT3gvc

Marketing Vac45 calves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvie8HF_xHU

The Oklahoma Quality Beef Network https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqpA3I8TrIM

 

Latest News

Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High
Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High

After a mostly sluggish April, market-ready fed cattle saw a solid rally in the North and steady money in the South. Futures markets began to look past the psychologically bearish H5N1 virus news.

APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison
APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison

APHIS issued its final rule on animal ID that has been in place since 2013, switching from solely visual tags to tags that are both electronically and visually readable for certain classes of cattle moving interstate.

How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?
How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?

“If we step back and look at what that means for farmland, we're taking our energy production system from highly centralized production facilities and we have to distribute it,” says David Muth.

Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado
Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado

Six wolf depredations of cattle have been confirmed in Colorado from reintroduced wolves.

Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid
Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid

Cattle and hog feeders find dramatically lower feed costs compared to last year with higher live anumal sales prices. Beef packers continue to struggle with negative margins.

Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation
Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation

What’s your context? One of the 6 soil health principles we discuss in this week’s episode is knowing your context. What’s yours? What is your goal? What’s the reason you run cattle?