Economist: Down Go the Cattle Numbers—Again

Farm Journal logo

The nation’s beef herd continues to decline.


“After several years of financial difficulty, producers show no interest in rebuilding the herd,” said Purdue University Extension economist Chris Hurt. “As a result, beef supplies will continue to decline and prices will remain strong for several years to come. On the down side, however, beef consumption per person will lag and other animal species will gain a larger market share in coming years, especially chicken.”

The USDA estimates that beef cow numbers as of July 1 dropped to 31.7 million head, a decline of 2% from a year ago. Milk cow numbers were down 1%. Just as important, producers reported they were retaining 2% fewer beef heifers to go back into the herds. This seemingly assures that beef cow numbers will continue to drop into early 2011.

“Low calf prices and large losses in cattle feeding since 2007 have continued to discourage beef cow expansion,” Hurt said. “In fact, the poor returns that were driven by much higher feed prices starting in late 2006 and culminating in the recessionary economy in 2009 resulted in an aborted beef expansion cycle.”

According to Hurt, the expansion phase of the beef cycle normally takes about six years. Beef cow numbers reached a low in 2004 and began an expansion in 2005 and 2006. That all changed in 2007 as numbers turned lower. Since 2006, beef cow numbers have dropped by 5%.

“The great news is that beef supplies will remain limited in 2010 and 2011,” said Hurt. “Per capita beef supplies will be down about 2% this year and will fall an additional 1% next year. Smaller available supplies mean that consumers will have to pay more for beef and that cattle prices should remain strong well into the future, perhaps for three to five years.”

Hurt said the unfortunate side of the story is that other meats are going to absorb some of beef’s market share. Pork availability per person will be down by nearly 5% this year, but herd expansion is expected to begin very late this year and into early 2011. This means that 2011 pork availability will be up 1 to 2%, especially late in the year.

“Of course broilers are the ones that will quickly fill the beef and pork shortfall, with a 6 percent expansion in available supplies per person this year and a further surge of 3% next year,” he said.

The high feed prices and recession were difficult for producers of all species. Total meat and poultry consumption in the United States fell from about 222 pounds per person in 2006 to 208 pounds in 2009. The drop in pork consumption was about 5%, chicken consumption was down 8%, but beef lead the decline with a 10% reduction.

“Chicken production will expand this year and next, and pork will be in expansion next year,” Hurt said. “This leaves only the beef industry with declining numbers and no expansion in sight.”

Seeing the beef industry move slowly to expansion is not a new concept. The beef cycle normally takes at least 10 years, and sometimes stretches to 15 years. The feathered industry responds much more rapidly.

“Unless feed prices return to much lower levels, it is likely that consumers will eat less red meat and poultry than at the peak in 2006.” Hurt said. “In order to eventually pass the higher feed prices on to consumers, the animal industry had to suffer large losses and eventually reduce the size of their herds. Once supplies are cut sufficiently, consumers have to pay higher prices for meat and poultry. Given these higher prices, consumers will eat less meat and poultry.”

According to Hurt, if the long period of increasing consumption of meat and poultry has come to an end, the U.S. market will have limited growth potential in coming years. If that is the case, the domestic market may only grow at about the same rate as the U.S. population, which has been somewhat under 1% per year.

“The best hope for more rapidly growing meat and poultry demand will probably come from exports,” he said. “The most robust growth will likely be in developing economies.

“For the next several years, beef supplies will be small, and many people still love beef. This likely means that beef cow ownership will be financially rewarded.”

 

 

Latest News

Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High
Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High

After a mostly sluggish April, market-ready fed cattle saw a solid rally in the North and steady money in the South. Futures markets began to look past the psychologically bearish H5N1 virus news.

APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison
APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison

APHIS issued its final rule on animal ID that has been in place since 2013, switching from solely visual tags to tags that are both electronically and visually readable for certain classes of cattle moving interstate.

How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?
How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?

“If we step back and look at what that means for farmland, we're taking our energy production system from highly centralized production facilities and we have to distribute it,” says David Muth.

Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado
Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado

Six wolf depredations of cattle have been confirmed in Colorado from reintroduced wolves.

Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid
Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid

Cattle and hog feeders find dramatically lower feed costs compared to last year with higher live anumal sales prices. Beef packers continue to struggle with negative margins.

Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation
Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation

What’s your context? One of the 6 soil health principles we discuss in this week’s episode is knowing your context. What’s yours? What is your goal? What’s the reason you run cattle?