USDA Faces Backlash Over Rules it Says will Help Poultry Growers

The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposed rules on Wednesday it said will help protect chicken producers from mistreatment by the small group of meat companies that control most of the country's production.

With less than six weeks left to the Obama administration, the agency clarified that individual farmers who feel they have been treated unfairly do not need to show the entire poultry industry was harmed to prove wrongdoing by a processor.

Two other rules would establish criteria for determining when companies have treated producers unfairly.

Proponents of the changes, including the National Farmers Union, said they hoped Republican President-elect Donald Trump's administration would allow them to take effect, citing the support he received from rural voters in the Nov. 8 election.

However, agricultural associations opposed to the rules said the regulations were overreaching. The National Pork Producers Council, a trade group, said they were "an apparent attack on rural America for its role in helping elect Donald Trump as president."

Speaking to reporters on a conference call, USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack, a Democrat, said that accusation was "absurd."

"This has got nothing to do with the election of 2016," he said. "This has everything to do with what's fair to producers."

Vilsack said it was "common sense" to clarify how producers must prove they were harmed and that the position represented a long-held view at the USDA. The agency said it acted to clarify the rule after four courts of appeal disagreed with the rule's previous version.

Four meat processors, including Tyson Foods Inc, control 51 percent of the U.S. market for chicken meat, according to the USDA. It said they "can often wield market power over the growers, treating them unfairly, suppressing how much they are paid, or pitting them against each other."

Tyson, the top chicken producer, said the rules were "bad for farmers, food companies and consumers, and we'll be working with others in the livestock and meat business to address it."

A spokesman for Pilgrim's Pride Corp, which is the second biggest chicken producer and mostly owned by meat packer JBS SA, did not respond to a request for comment.

Mike Weaver, who raises chickens for Pilgrim's Pride and is president of the Contract Poultry Growers Association of the Virginias, said he hoped the rules would give farmers more freedom to speak out against abuses.

"Everybody needs these types of protections against these multinational companies that are running agriculture in this country," he said.


Latest News

NCBA Reports On Q1 Voluntary Price Discovery Framework

NCBA president Jerry Bohn said a major trigger in negotiated trade data was tripped during the first quarter of 2021, as determined by the Live Cattle Marketing Working Group Regional Triggers Subgroup.

TSCRA Disaster Relief Fund Distributes Aid

Thanks to contributions from across the U.S., Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association Disaster Relief Fund mailed checks totaling $112,750 to cattle raisers financially burdened by February’s Winter Storm Uri.

Retail Beef Sales Remain Strong During February

Sales of all food and beverage items during February were 11.8% higher than during February 2020, and the meat department was an above-average performer.

Land Grab or Climate Solution? President Biden Could Unveil '30 by 30' Plan Details Next Week

Details of a U.S. land and water related executive order could be unveiled soon. Known as the ’30 by 30’ plan, it would place 30% of U.S. lands and 30% of U.S. waters under federal jurisdiction by 2030.

Ranching by the Seat of Your Pants

Oregon rancher Alec Oliver was determined to return to ranching and working from horseback after he was paralyzed in a vehicle accident nearly a decade ago.

CRP ground rotator
Vilsack Hints at Possible CRP Changes Coming Soon with Biden's 30 By 30 Plan

CRP could be in focus again. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said this week that he thinks greater opportunities are coming for landowners to take less productive farmland out of production and place into CRP.