About That Confined-Cow Thing

A friend called the other day and asked suspiciously what I thought about the confined-cow idea. He feared it could set up a pathway for true vertical integration in the beef industry.

BT_Feedlot_Cows_Calves
BT_Feedlot_Cows_Calves
(Wyatt Bechtel)

By: Alan Newport, editor of Drovers/CattleNetwork

A friend called the other day and asked suspiciously what I thought about the confined-cow idea. He feared it could set up a pathway for true vertical integration in the beef industry.

I grant he could be right, but I see some advantages. Since per-cow land costs these days are running $13,000 to $17,000, this may be a viable way to expand a herd and/or bring young people onto an existing ranch. Even if we take my standard that you can at least double your stocking rate with well-managed grazing, that still suggests per-cow costs run $5,000 to $8,500.

Also, considering the energy demands of the modern, oversized and over-milked cow, partial or total confinement can meet these needs more easily — and with timeliness — than can be done on rangeland. At the Eng Foundation symposium on confined-cow production in September, nearly all the speakers with experience said confined cows can be kept with a 40 to 50 percent decrease in feed because they move about less to forage, and the higher quality nutrition allows a more restricted diet — actually limit-feeding — that still keeps the cows and calves very healthy and productive.

Read more on CattleNetwork.com.

Drovers_Logo_No-Tagline (1632x461)
Drovers_Logo_No-Tagline (1632x461)
Read Next
Following Douglas, Ariz., Santa Teresa, N.M., becomes the second southern crossing to restart trade with mandatory EID tracking and screwworm safeguards.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alert
Get News & Markets App