Hormones in Beef: Myth vs. Fact

Farm Journal logo

Much confusion and concern often surrounds the use of hormones in beef production.
By: Amanda Blair, SDSU Extension Meat Science Specialist & SDSU Associate Professor

These "chemical messengers" are substances produced in the body that travel through the bloodstream to regulate body functions such as reproduction, metabolism and growth. 

Hormones such as estrogens or androgens are often administered to growing cattle intended for slaughter to promote growth by complementing the effects of naturally occurring hormones.  

These growth-promoting hormones are generally administered to cattle in the form of small pellets termed 'implants', placed under the skin in the animal's ear. 

The boost in growth rate created by hormone implants allows for cattle to be finished earlier, thereby requiring less time on feed and fewer resources per pound of meat produced.

Are these hormones safe?
A common myth surrounding beef produced with additional hormones is that it is unsafe to consume. The fact is that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulates the development and use of hormone implants and the Food Safety Inspection Service of the USDA routinely monitors residues of synthetic hormones in meat. 

It is true that beef from hormone-implanted cattle has increased estrogenic activity compared with non-implanted animals.  This fact alone may alarm beef consumers; but it must be put into the context of actual amounts consumed and the levels found in other products. 

As shown in the table, beef from a non-implanted steer contains .85 units of estrogenic activity per 3 oz. serving, while beef from an implanted steer contains 1.2 units of estrogenic activity in a similar size serving.

However, this amount is a fraction of what is found in many other common foods. 

For example, the same quantity of eggs would provide 94 units of estrogenic activity and a 3 oz. serving of tofu would provide 19,306,004 units of estrogenic activity.  In fact, a normal adult male produces 136,000 nanograms of estrogen per day while a non-pregnant women produces on average 513,000 nanograms daily. This makes consumption of the levels of estrogen in implanted beef relatively inconsequential.   

Hormone-free doesn't exist
It is also important to understand that there is no such thing as "hormone-free" beef.  As stated above, hormones are naturally occurring. If they were eliminated completely from the body, the animal could not survive.  Therefore, any amount of beef, or any animal product for that matter, will have some level of naturally occurring hormone present.

There are products available from beef that have not been administered additional hormones. 

Beef marketed under the label of "naturally raised" must be raised in accordance with the supporting USDA voluntary claim standards. These cattle must be grown without growth-promoting hormones, fed no animal byproducts or antibiotics.

Also, beef labeled "organic" is not administered implants and must adhere to the USDA guidelines for organic beef production. 

As implants reduce the cost of production consumers should expect to pay a premium for products carrying those labels.

To learn more about hormones in beef production and other common myths in the meat industry visit the Meat Myth Crushers website

Capture

 

Latest News

Biden Administration Restores Wildlife Protections
Biden Administration Restores Wildlife Protections

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service plans to reinstate rules protecting endangered plants and animals, action that would reverse changes made during the Trump Administration that weakened the Endangered Species Act.

Across Breed EPD Adjustment Factors
Across Breed EPD Adjustment Factors

EPDs from multiple breeds can be compared by adding/subtracting the appropriate adjustment factors to the EPDs resulting from the most recent genetic evaluations for each of 18 breeds.

APHIS Now Thinks Wild Birds Are to Blame for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza's Arrival on Four U.S. Dairies
APHIS Now Thinks Wild Birds Are to Blame for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza's Arrival on Four U.S. Dairies

The livestock industry continues to grapple with the first confirmed cases of HPAI in cattle, while federal and state agencies continue to assure consumers there's no concern about the safety of the U.S. milk supply.

Skills Survey Reveals U.S. Agriculture & Food Industry Workforce Needs and Gaps
Skills Survey Reveals U.S. Agriculture & Food Industry Workforce Needs and Gaps

U.S. employers report challenges in finding suitable job candidates with work-ready skills to fill open roles in ag. The AgCareers.com U.S. Skills Survey offers insights, data and trends to address skill development.

USDA Authorizes CRP Graze and Hay Donations to Wildfire Victims
USDA Authorizes CRP Graze and Hay Donations to Wildfire Victims

Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) participants can donate emergency grazing authority to ranchers in Nebraska, Oklahoma and Texas impacted by recent wildfires.

New Guide Helps Producers Maximize Values of Cull Cows
New Guide Helps Producers Maximize Values of Cull Cows

A new resource developed by the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association and CattleFax helps cattle producers maximize profitability from their culling decisions.