Nalivka: Measuring for Economic Outcomes

Carbon counting – which is ill defined – may be one more regulatory hurdle akin to federal lands grazing management plans with somewhat undefinable outcomes but are ridden with regulations.

Dodge Ranch WY
Dodge Ranch WY
(.)

It won’t surprise you to know I am a numbers guy. Generally, anyone who analyzes markets, the industry or tracks ranch budgets is a numbers person. That all goes without saying. But numbers are a tool, albeit a necessary tool, that are combined with experience and industry knowledge to feed the analysis and arrive at conclusions or opinions.

I have advocated for years in working with ranchers that analyzing decisions requires quantifying what occurs on the ranch including operating budgets and performance data. I firmly believe that most change requires measurement.

I recently attended a meeting where the topic of trading carbon credits came up. That discussion quickly led to the question of “how do you measure carbon emissions?” That measurement is crucial to the entire topic of carbon trading. Well, I guess the more accurate statement is that it should be crucial. It’s kind of like using the futures market as a hedging tool. Saying what you think the breakeven is on a pen of cattle won’t quite cut it. The same with the methane produced on the ranch. But, aside from measuring methane production or reduction for carbon credits, I think there is a much larger issue.

That larger issue is getting cattle off the planet. I would ask the simple question - do we really think this is about carbon credits to reduce methane production and positively affect climate change over the next 50 years? I might suggest that this carbon counting – which is ill defined – may be one more regulatory hurdle akin to federal lands grazing management plans with somewhat undefinable outcomes but are ridden with regulations. I would submit that there are much more productive ways to spend time – analyzing financial results, perhaps?

I would bet that you, your dad, your grandfather or perhaps even your great-grandfather who put the ranch together and kept it economically viable for the first 100 years knew a little about sustainability. Furthermore, I bet the same people knew that sustainability wasn’t dependent on counting cow farts, but rather be a good steward of the land and making sound decisions about efficiently producing beef. Speaking of production efficiency, in 2022, the U.S. beef industry will produce 4 billion more pounds of beef (a record) than in 1975 with 40 million less cattle. I wonder how much less methane the industry is producing with those cows!

Drovers_Logo_No-Tagline (1632x461)
Drovers_Logo_No-Tagline (1632x461)
Read Next
As the cost of high-quality bulls climbs, reproductive physiologist Jaclyn Ketchum explains how artificial insemination offers elite genetics and superior herd uniformity for a fraction of the investment.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alert
Get News & Markets App