Speaker McCarthy Selects Unruly House Rules Panel

For example, Rep. Ralph Norman in the past unsuccessfully pushed crop insurance amendments that would have cut premium incentives/subsidies by 15% for producers with specified adjusted gross incomes.

Norman and Roy were among those initially opposing McCarthy’s speaker bid, and Massie in the past has been a real pain for GOP leadership plans. 
Norman and Roy were among those initially opposing McCarthy’s speaker bid, and Massie in the past has been a real pain for GOP leadership plans.
(Farm Journal)

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) issued the new GOP roster for the House Rules Committee Monday, and he made good on his pledges to give his conference’s hard right three positions on the powerful panel, which decides along with the speaker the bills going to the floor and the scope of amendments and debate.

He named Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) and Chip Roy (R-Texas) to the panel. All have track records of holding up major spending legislation, emergency disaster aid and forcing votes on divisive amendments against the wishes of GOP leadership.

Read more: Bank of America Says a U.S. Debt Default is “Likely”

Norman and Roy were among those initially opposing McCarthy’s speaker bid, and Massie in the past has been a real pain for GOP leadership plans.

Key for the Ag Sector

Norman in the past unsuccessfully pushed crop insurance amendments that would have cut premium incentives/subsidies by 15% for producers with specified adjusted gross incomes. Another amendment, co-sponsored by Norman, would have effectively muted the harvest price option.

Read more: Debt Limit Debate: $1 Trillion Coin Not Off the Table

Bottom Line

If Norman, Massie and Roy are in agreement, they can functionally block legislation, even bills McCarthy supports, from getting to the floor — unless McCarthy and his allies can garner Democratic votes on the legislation. But the minority usually votes no on the 9-4 split panel.

Drovers_Logo_No-Tagline (1632x461)
Drovers_Logo_No-Tagline (1632x461)
Read Next
Company cites ‘continued uncertainty’ as the reason for the May 20 lockout in Fort Morgan, stressing that the $33.4 million contract offer remains fair and competitive.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alert
Get News & Markets App