Top-down or Bottom Up Animal ID?

Farm Journal logo

Source: National Institute for Animal Agriculture press release

Diverse opinions and facts were voiced, shared and questioned at ID•INFO EXPO 2009 last week in Kansas City, Mo. More than two dozen speakers representing federal and state government, agribusinesses, media, industry—large producers as well as small producers—and the food industry conveyed their messages related to the current state of animal identification in the United States.

Sponsored by the National Institute for Animal Agriculture, the EXPO allowed EXPO participants to get their to-the-point questions answered in front of the assembly while breaks provided opportunity for one-on-one conversations between speakers and attendees.

"No one was here to endorse or negate NAIS (the National Animal Identification System),” says "We gathered to listen, learn, clarify concerns and opportunities, identify next steps and collaborate on furthering animal identification in the U.S.”

"In the end, consensus was that a top-down approach to national animal identification isn't the answer and neither is a bottom-up approach,” says Glenn Fischer, chairman of the ID•INFO EXPO Planning Committee. "A vast majority agreed that the best approach is somewhere in the middle with producer understanding of the program and dedicated leadership needed to make a program work.”

Dr. William Hartmann, executive director and state veterinarian, Minnesota Board of Animal Health, summarized his state animal health experiences and views quite succinctly: "A national animal identification plan is not a question of mandatory or voluntary. It's a necessity.

Whether animal agriculture likes it or not, "necessity” it could become as Dr. David Acheson, formerly of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration who now serves as managing director of food and import safety practice at Leavitt Partners in Utah, pointed out that the Obama Administration "wants to make capital out of protecting the food supply.” Acheson noted that food safety efforts by the FDA under Obama will be stepped up, adding that a food traceability requirement is likely.

Presentations from ID•INFO EXPO 2009 are available at www.animalagriculture.org.

 

 

Latest News

Can High Cattle Prices Pay for Mistakes?
Can High Cattle Prices Pay for Mistakes?

High prices are a welcome change for cattle producers, but it’s important to remember that higher prices mean mistakes cost more than when prices are low, says a University of Missouri Extension livestock specialist.

NEW: USDA Confirms Cow-to-Cow Transmission a Factor in Avian Flu Spread
NEW: USDA Confirms Cow-to-Cow Transmission a Factor in Avian Flu Spread

USDA said this week cow-to-cow transmission is a factor in the spread of avian flu in dairy herds, but it still does not know exactly how the virus is being moved around.

Plant-Based Meat Analogues Aren't Better for Your Heart, Study Says
Plant-Based Meat Analogues Aren't Better for Your Heart, Study Says

A new study debunks plant-based meat analogue product claims to be healthier for your diet than real meat.

Agriculture Emissions Fall to Lowest Levels in 10 Years
Agriculture Emissions Fall to Lowest Levels in 10 Years

U.S. agriculture reduced greenhouse gas emissions through voluntary conservation efforts and market-based incentives.

Estrus Detection Aids and Timed Cattle Breeding
Estrus Detection Aids and Timed Cattle Breeding

The advent of timed AI protocols became a game-changer in allowing professionals, like AI technicians or veterinarians, to breed many females effectively and quickly.

Trace Mineral Verification Program Supports Optimal Performance
Trace Mineral Verification Program Supports Optimal Performance

One of the industry’s leading collaborations between Purina Animal Nutrition and Zinpro helps optimize cattle performance.