The Impact of Bull Selection – Part 2

.
.
(.)

Last week I left you with the question:  Which bull transmits more profit potential to this operation?  Before the answer, a brief recap of the example:

In a herd using bulls as rotational sires, selecting the best 20% of heifers to develop as replacements, and selling all other calves at weaning, with the following levels performance:

  • 1,400 pound average mature cow weight
  • 85% pregnancy rate
  • 82% calf crop weaned
  • Average weaning weight 500 pounds
  • Pounds of Calf Weaned/Exposed Female = 410

This data indicates that improving the Pounds of Calf Weaned/Exposed Female on a whole herd basis results in more profit potential of this operation.

Average genetic values of five bulls that sired the existing cowherd:

  •                         WW                 HP                   Milk                 MW                           

Average:                     71                    9                     20                   88

 

Now we consider the genetic values of two new potential herd  bulls.

New Herd Bull 1          71                15                    20                   68

New Herd Bull 2        101                  9                    20                 122

 

What should we expect if we fast forward 5 – 6 years? 

If we select Bull 1

  • 1,380 pound average mature cow size
  • 91% pregnancy rate
  • 88% calf crop weaned
  • Average weaning weight 500 pounds
  • Pounds of Calf Weaned/Exposed Female = 440

If we select Bull 2

  • 1,434 pound average mature cow size
  • 85% pregnancy rate
  • 82% calf crop weaned
  • Average weaning weight 530 pounds
  • Pounds of Calf Weaned/Exposed Female = 434.6

So if this was a 100 cow operation, by the next generation:

If we select new sire 1, we would be selling 79 weaned calves (44 steers & 35 hfrs) at 500 pounds = 39,500 pounds of weaning pay weight

If we used new sire 2, we would be selling 74 weaned calves (41 steers & 33 hfrs) at 530 pounds = 39,220 pounds of weaning pay weight

Furthermore, the lighter weight calves would be worth more $/pound, and 1,380 pound cows would cost less in feed and maintenance than 1,434 pound cows.

The Answer

Bull 1, because of the genetic potential to improve fertility, reduce mature cow size and maintain the current level of weaning growth, adds more profit potential to the operation.

Dr. Mark Johnson discusses weighing genetic options when selecting a bull on SunUpTV. http://sunup.okstate.edu/category/ccc/2022/030522-ccc

Related stories:

The Impact of Bull Selection - Part 1

 

Latest News

AFIA Objects to EPA’s Draft Risk Evaluation of Formaldehyde
AFIA Objects to EPA’s Draft Risk Evaluation of Formaldehyde

The American Feed Industry Association says formaldehyde has been "safely used in the U.S. animal food industry for over 40 years via accurate automated equipment."

Power of Meat Reports Strong Meat Consumption, Evolving Consumer Trends
Power of Meat Reports Strong Meat Consumption, Evolving Consumer Trends

The Meat Institute and FMI-The Food Industry Association released the 19th annual Power of Meat report.

Cattle Imports from Mexico
Cattle Imports from Mexico

Mexico has become one of the major beef import sources for the U.S. as beef trade evolved from simply supplementing deficit beef production in Mexico to bilateral, product specific trade between the two countries.

Markets: Cash Cattle Markets Nearing Historic Highs
Markets: Cash Cattle Markets Nearing Historic Highs

All classes of cattle sold at higher prices for the week and most are at or near record highs. Supplies of all classes remain extremely tight.

International Genetic Solutions Debuts New Informational Resource
International Genetic Solutions Debuts New Informational Resource

International Genetic Solutions (IGS) recently unveiled a new information resource and video platform for important beef industry topics pertinent to producers’ bottom lines.

Sage_Grouse_Booming
Ranchers Urge BLM to Incorporate Latest Science in New Sage Grouse Plans

NCBA and PLC are requesting that BLM significantly extend the comment period deadlines while ranchers and other local stakeholders evaluate these lengthy proposals.