Saving Taxpayers More Than $100 Billion

Editor’s Note: The following editorial is from Farm Policy Facts, a coalition of farmers and commodity groups created to educate Members of Congress and Americans about the importance of agriculture and its contribution to a strong U.S economy.  

Workhorses rarely get the attention they deserve even though they are the ones that get the job done, especially in a place like Washington. And, when it comes to reducing federal spending, the Agriculture Committees are the real workhorses in town.

There is much ado about budgets these days. The Trump administration published its plan in May. The U.S. House of Representatives Budget Committee released and advanced its proposal this week. Both budgets set lofty goals for deficit reduction and goals are good. But, what really matters is execution.

In the midst of an atmosphere of dysfunction, members of the Agriculture Committees diligently worked together to write a farm bill with bipartisan consensus that repealed and reformed policy, and cut federal spending in an open, transparent way. It was a long, exhausting process that culminated in the Agricultural Act of 2014, otherwise known as the 2014 Farm Bill.

At the time of passage, it was slated to save taxpayers $23 billion. Today, those savings have increased fourfold, to more than $100 billion. Meanwhile, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), other laws enacted in 2014 actually increased the deficit by $24 billion. Since then other enacted bills have driven the deficit $650 billion higher.

"This level of savings is especially impressive given that the entire farm bill comprises 1.7 percent of the total federal budget," wrote House Agriculture Committee Chairman Mike Conaway concerning the more than $100 billion in savings in a letter to the Budget Committee earlier this year.

Left out of the letter, but still very relevant, is the fact that agriculture also accounts for roughly 30 percent of the non-Medicare, non-defense mandatory sequester – the automatic spending cuts required under the 2011 Budget Control Act.

In other words, as Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts recently said, "Ag has already given at the store."

The Agriculture Committees may not be the perch that will land Members on the 24-hour news programs. And, the farm bill is not likely to make the evening news either. But, at the end of the day, the Agriculture Committees are the workhorses that get it done.

 

 

Latest News

BLM Rescinds Hammond's Grazing Permits

In another installment in the years-long saga of the Hammond Ranch, the Interior Department on Friday rescinded grazing permits that had been restored under the Trump administration.

CAB Insider: Quality Carcass Spreads Turn Up Early

The two weeks in the middle of the month marked by extreme weather and insufficient fed cattle to harvest-space put a cap on cattle prices as packers found themselves well-supplied.

Victor Ranch Receives Oklahoma Leopold Conservation Award

The Victor Ranch has been selected as the recipient of the 2020 Oklahoma Leopold Conservation Award®, which recognizes land owners who inspire with their dedication to land, water and wildlife habitat resources.

Sexten: Respiratory Disease Timing

There are few no-risk options in the cattle business, but calves with reputation, high-growth potential and a well-executed health program should provide cattle feeders with relatively fewer health challenges.

USCA Supports Cattle Market Transparency Act of 2021

U.S. Cattlemen's Association supports the Cattle Market Transparency Act, which seeks to ensure regionally sufficient negotiated cash trade, and equipping producers with more information to aid marketing decisions.

NCBA Welcomes Discussion on Cattle Market Transparency Act

The Cattle Market Transparency Act, if enacted, would direct the Secretary of Agriculture and the Office of the Chief Economist at USDA to establish regional mandatory minimums for negotiated trade of fed cattle.