50 Cent per Head Tax Proposed in West Virginia for Predator Control

A tax being proposed in West Virginia would assess a voluntary $0.50 per head tax to cattle producers to cover predator control in the state. ( Farm Journal )

In West Virginia a State House bill could create a voluntary tax that would create funding to help protect cattle from predators, especially coyotes.

Del. Isaac Sponaugle (D-Pendleton) and Del. Allen Evans (R-Grant) are cosponsoring House Bill 3027 in the West Virginia House of Delegates. The bill would create a 50 cent per head of cattle tax assessment for county assessors to collect with personal property taxes. Money would go towards the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s coyote control program in West Virginia.

The tax proceeds would go towards the M-44 cyanide device that is only authorized for use by the USDA to control predators like coyotes.

”In short, the state of West Virginia pays the USDA somewhere between $200,000 to $400,000 a year in matching funds to continue with the USDA Wildlife Predator Program. This program is designed to take care of coyotes among other predators,” Sponaugle says.

The legislation was requested by members of the Pendleton County Farm Bureau where Sponaugle and Evans both have constituents. The West Virginia Farm Bureau reviewed and approved the bill prior to its proposal in the House Agriculture Committee last year, but was stalled in the Finance Committee.

It is estimated that predators kill approximately 500 calves in West Virginia each year, costing $465,000 in economic losses to producers.

Cattlemen who don’t want to participate in the predator control program don’t have to pay the assessment says Sponaugle.

West Virginia already has a mandatory tax in place for sheep and goats to control coyotes. It is double the price at $1 per head.

West Virginia Agriculture Commissioner Kent Leonhardt supports the cattle predator tax because it is voluntary.

“I like that it’s voluntary,” Leonhardt says. “It’s really not a tax at all, more like insurance for cattle.”

Read more about the proposed House Bill 3027 legislation in West Virginia, here.


Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
7 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Submitted by Jason on Tue, 01/23/2018 - 11:16

Isn't this a self inflicted problem? Didn't the state of West Virginia release Coyotes to reduce the deer herd but now they want to tax cows to protect the cattle population.

Submitted by Carlyle Holman on Wed, 01/24/2018 - 08:00

Sounds to me like the M 44 Cyanide Device should have
been used on the DNR and NUT cases that reintroducted Coyotes and Wolves. Wake up America!!!

Submitted by Anthony Sloan on Wed, 01/24/2018 - 10:12

We had cattle for years with never a loss to the abundant coyote population. We kept our cattle up close at calving time. I'm not afraid of the big bad wolf or coyote, they're just another of God's creation doing as he created them.

Submitted by DJ on Fri, 02/09/2018 - 07:48

Thank you, Anthony. We, as American producers, have to stop trying to kill everything. We can co-exist with God's creation, we just have to be creative sometimes. When our first response is to kill everything that presents a problem, we often realize that we have put things out of balance and other problems arise. We have sheep without predator losses. We just have to be creative in some ways. I wouldn't be averse to doing a little trapping in our area, but overall I appreciate the coyotes and buzzard we have because they do their job well.

In reply to by Anthony Sloan (not verified)